Intent Recognition with Low Resource Adaptation in Minority Language Services

Authors

  • Alice Griffiths Department of Computing, Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, England, United Kingdom Author
  • Nicholas Jenkins Department of Computing, Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, England, United Kingdom Author

Keywords:

Intent Recognition, Low Resource Adaptation, Benchmark Study, Minority Language Services, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The rapid advancement of natural language processing technologies has revolutionized human-computer interaction, primarily through sophisticated intent recognition systems. However, these advancements remain disproportionately concentrated within high-resource languages, leaving minority and marginalized language communities with substandard digital services. This paper presents a comprehensive benchmark study that bridges the gap between low-resource adaptation techniques and practical intent recognition for minority language services. By constructing and evaluating a robust benchmark across multiple low-resource languages, this research investigates the efficacy of various cross-lingual transfer methodologies, data augmentation strategies, and few-shot learning paradigms. The core objective is to determine how limited linguistic resources can be optimally leveraged to build accurate and resilient intent classification systems. Through rigorous empirical analysis, this study demonstrates that advanced representation alignment and structurally aware adaptation frameworks significantly enhance intent recognition accuracy, even when training data is severely constrained. The findings provide critical evidence for the necessity of tailored algorithmic interventions rather than direct zero-shot applications from high-resource models. Ultimately, this work offers a foundational framework for researchers and service providers aiming to develop inclusive digital platforms, ensuring that minority language speakers receive equitable access to automated linguistic services.

References

1. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q. Artificial intelligence and supply chain stabilization. Financ. Res. Lett. 2026, 89, 109322.

2. Lee, J.; Bagheri, B.; Kao, H.A. A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 2015, 3, 18–23.

3. Kurukuru, V.S.B.; Haque, A.; Khan, M.A.; Sahoo, S.; Malik, A.; Blaabjerg, F. A Review on Artificial Intelligence Applications for Grid-Connected Solar Photovoltaic Systems. Energies 2021, 14, 4690.

4. Ukoba, K.; Olatunji, K.O.; Adeoye, E.; Jen, T.-C.; Madyira, D.M. Optimizing Renewable Energy Systems through Artificial Intelligence: Review and Future Prospects. Energy Environ. 2024, 35, 3833–3879.

5. Nam, K.; Dutt, C.S.; Chathoth, P.; Daghfous, A.; Khan, M.S. The adoption of artificial intelligence and robotics in the hotel industry: Prospects and challenges. Electron. Mark. 2021, 31, 553–574.

6. Kinkel, S.; Baumgartner, M.; Cherubini, E. Prerequisites for the adoption of AI technologies in manufacturing—Evidence from a worldwide sample of manufacturing companies. Technovation 2020, 110, 102375.

7. Ransbotham, S.; Kiron, D.; Gerbert, P.; Reeves, M. Reshaping Business with Artificial Intelligence: Closing the Gap Between Ambition and Action. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2017, 59, 1–23.

8. Mumin, Y.A.; Abdulai, A.; Goetz, R. The role of social networks in the adoption of competing new technologies in Ghana. J. Agric. Econ. 2023, 74, 510–533.

9. Sultana, N.; Tsutsumida, N. A Review on Data-Driven Methods for Solar Energy Forecasting. Appl. Energy 2025, 400, 126631.

10. Amaro e Silva, R.; Brito, M.C. Spatio-Temporal PV Forecasting Sensitivity to Modules’ Tilt and Orientation. Appl. Energy 2019, 255, 113807.

11. Ren, Y.; Suganthan, P.N.; Srikanth, N. Ensemble Methods for Wind and Solar Power Forecasting—A State-of-the-Art Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 50, 82–91.

12. Mayer, M.J.; Baran, Á.; Lerch, S.; Horat, N.; Yang, D.; Baran, S. Post-Processing of Ensemble Photovoltaic Power Forecasts with Distributional and Quantile Regression Methods. Sol. Energy 2025, 307, 114361.

13. Li, B.; Feng, C.; Siebenschuh, C.; Zhang, R.; Spyrou, E.; Krishnan, V.; Hobbs, B.F.; Zhang, J. Sizing Ramping Reserve Using Probabilistic Solar Forecasts: A Data-Driven Method. Appl. Energy 2022, 313, 118812.

14. He, Y.; Guo, S.; Dong, P.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhou, J. A State-of-the-Art Review and Bibliometric Analysis on the Sizing Optimization of off-Grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 183, 113476.

15. Safari, A.; Daneshvar, M.; Anvari-Moghaddam, A. Energy Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence for Energy Management. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11112.

16. Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Stroyuk, O.; Raievska, O.; Lüer, L.; Hauch, J.A.; Brabec, C.J. Self-Driving AMADAP Laboratory: Accelerating the Discovery and Optimization of Emerging Perovskite Photovoltaics. MRS Bull. 2024, 49, 1284–1294.

17. Lin, J.; Wang, F.; Wei, L. Alumni social networks and hedge fund performance: Evidence from China. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2021, 78, 101931.

18. Westphal, J. Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Acad. Manag. J. 1999, 42, 7–24.

19. Upadhyay, A.D.; Bhargava, R.; Faircloth, S.; Zeng, H. Inside directors, risk aversion, and firm performance. Rev. Financ. Econ. 2017, 32, 64–74.

20. Bone, M.; González Ehlinger, E.; Stephany, F. Skills or Degree? The Rise of Skill-Based Hiring for AI and Green Jobs. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2025, 214, 124042.

21. Fabra, N.; Gutiérrez, E.; Lacuesta, A.; Ramos, R. Do Renewable Energy Investments Create Local Jobs? J. Public Econ. 2024, 239, 105212.

22. Shen, Y.; Ling, Z.; Fengyun, W. Deeply Mark of Mother School on Innovation: Evidence from Alumni Networks and Patent Applications. China Ind. Econ. 2017, 8, 156–173.

23. IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission). Artificial Intelligence Across Industries; International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.

24. Chowdhury, S.D.; Wang, E.Z. Board size, director compensation, and firm transition across stock exchanges: Evidence from Canada. J. Manag. Gov. 2020, 24, 685–712.

25. Kroesen, M. Residential self-selection and the reverse causation hypothesis: Assessing the endogeneity of stated reasons for residential choice. Travel Behav. Soc. 2019, 16, 108–117.

26. Schmitt, B. Speciesism: An obstacle to AI and robot adoption. Mark. Lett. 2020, 31, 3–6.

27. MacCarthy, M.; Morgan, A.; Lambert, C. Congregating as a social phenomenon; the social glue that binds. Int. J. Event Festiv. Manag. 2022, 13, 235–246.

28. Qi, T.; Li, J.; Xie, W.; Ding, H. Alumni Networks and Investment Strategy: Evidence from Chinese Mutual Funds. Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade 2020, 56, 2639–2655.

29. Xu, Z.; Hou, J. Effects of ceo overseas experience on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from chinese manufacturing listed companies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5335.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-16

Issue

Section

Articles