Data Interoperability with Ontology Alignment Strategies across Biomedical Terminology Repositories
Keywords:
Biomedical Ontologies, Graph Analysis, Data Interoperability, Semantic Alignment, Ontology Alignment StrategiesAbstract
The exponential growth of biomedical data has necessitated the development of robust terminology repositories to facilitate seamless data integration and interoperability. However, the diverse structural and semantic properties of these repositories often hinder effective cross-platform data exchange. This paper investigates the predictability of data interoperability outcomes based on ontology alignment strategies, utilizing advanced graph analysis techniques. By conceptualizing biomedical terminologies as complex network graphs, we systematically evaluate how different alignment strategies impact the topological characteristics of the integrated knowledge spaces. The study extracts structural features from ontology graphs, including degree distribution, centrality measures, and modularity, to model the underlying alignment dynamics. We propose a comprehensive methodological framework that employs graph-based predictive modeling to forecast the success of semantic interoperability between distinct clinical repositories. Through extensive empirical analysis of large-scale biomedical ontologies, our findings indicate that specific graph-theoretic metrics strongly correlate with high-fidelity data integration. Furthermore, predictive models leveraging these network features demonstrate significant accuracy in estimating interoperability performance prior to the execution of computationally expensive alignment processes. This research provides a foundational understanding of the relationship between network topology and semantic alignment, offering strategic guidance for optimizing biomedical data integration workflows.References
1. Sauer, T.; Spielmann, L.; Gorks, M.; Zindler, K.; Jumar, U. Model Predictive Control of Industrial Trucks with AI-based Plant Model Selection. In Proceedings of the 2023 9th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), Rome, Italy, 3–6 July 2023; pp. 263–268.
2. Trautwein, F.; Dietrich, D.; Pott, A.; Verl, A. Strategy for Topological Reconfiguration of Cable-Driven Parallel Robots. J. Mech. Rob. 2024, 17, 010908.
3. Irawan, A.; Yaacob, M.A.; Azman, F.A.; Daud, M.R.; Razali, A.R.; Sheikh Ali, S.N. Vision-based Alignment Control for Mini Forklift System in Confine Area Operation. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Symposium on Agent, Multi-Agent Systems and Robotics (ISAMSR), Putrajaya, Malaysia, 27–28 August 2018; pp. 1–6.
4. Hutauruk, A.R.; Rohman, A.S.; Rusmin, P.H. Rollover Stability Control of Autonomous Forklift Using Optimal Control Approach. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 13th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET), Shah Alam, Malaysia, 2 October 2023; pp. 334–339.
5. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015.
6. Tiozzo Fasiolo, D.; Scalera, L.; Maset, E. Comparing LiDAR and IMU-based SLAM approaches for 3D robotic mapping. Robotica 2023, 41, 2588–2604.
7. Wu, C.; Gong, Z.; Tao, B.; Tan, K.; Gu, Z.; Yin, Z.P. RF-SLAM: UHF-RFID Based Simultaneous Tags Mapping and Robot Localization Algorithm for Smart Warehouse Position Service. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2023, 19, 11765–11775.
8. Yao, M.; Zhou, X.; Shao, Z.; Wang, L. A General Energy Modeling Network for Serial Industrial Robots Integrating Physical Mechanism Priors. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2024, 89, 102761.
9. Signifredi, A.; Luca, B.; Coati, A.; Medina, J.S.; Molinari, D. A General Purpose Approach for Global and Local Path Planning Combination. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Gran Canaria, Spain, 15–18 September 2015; pp. 996–1001.
10. de Silva, R.; Cox, J.; Heselden, J.R.; Popović, M.; Cadena, C.; Polvara, R. Semantic Landmark Particle Filter for Robot Localisation in Vineyards. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2603.10847.
11. Zhang, H.; Lan, B.; Dong, Y.; Tian, G.; Lam, K.M.; Shi, L. Path Following of Autonomous Forklifts via Nonlinear Model Predictive Control. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 2025, 30, 3180–3187.
12. Willekens, A.; Temmerman, S.; Wyffels, F.; Pieters, J.G.; Cool, S.R. Development of an agricultural robot taskmap operation framework. J. Field Robot. 2025, 42, 4256–4287.
13. Ma, Z.; Li, N.; Hou, C.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Qin, C. Customized Flat Paper Pallet Picking Path Planning of Intelligent Forklift Based on GPOPS. In Proceedings of the 2025 8th International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering (ICAACE), Shanghai, China, 21–23 March 2025; pp. 505–509.
14. Mohammadi, A.; Mareels, I.; Oetomo, D. Model predictive motion control of autonomous forklift vehicles with dynamics balance constraint. In Proceedings of the 2016 14th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), Phuket, Thailand, 13–15 November 2016; pp. 1–6.
15. Crocetti, F.; Bellocchio, E.; Dionigi, A.; Felicioni, S.; Costante, G.; Fravolini, M.L.; Valigi, P. ARD-VO: Agricultural robot data set of vineyards and olive groves. J. Field Robot. 2023, 40, 1678–1696.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.